Loretta reports:
In connection with my post on June 1817 fashions and caps, a reader said:
“I can't find a good pattern for a cap, or a turban. What would a Dowagwer wear on her head at a ball?”
Nancy Bradfield’s Costume in Detail 1730-1930 (described here) explains in minute detail the construction of some caps. Based on the cap I photographed at the 1809 Hedge House, I’d say the construction was fairly simple. It’s the trimming that makes caps individual. One of my favorite resources, The Lady’s Stratagem, a splendid compendium of excerpts from various manuals of the 1820s, has a section devoted to making caps, from three sources: the Manuel des dames, Manuel des demoiselles, and The Alphabetical Receipt Book and Domestic Advisor. The excerpt from the latter includes patterns.
The French manuals provide as well some guidance about appropriate attire for married and unmarried ladies. Though the French, as Fanny Trollope has pointed out, have stricter ideas about what “modest” and “simple” mean in reference to unmarried ladies’ dress, a general rule seems to apply on either side of the Channel: Married women may dress more boldly and elaborately than maidens.
As to dowagers, what they wear would depend on their age and taste, I should think. We need to remember that fashion was not as standardized then as it is today. I would not expect her to wear simple hair ornaments to a ball. That seems more appropriate for a debutante. But she might wear a turban. Plumes are certainly possible. In portraits, older women are often wearing elaborate caps. However, in satirical prints, we see them in elaborate headdresses for evening dress. I suspect these are close to reality, though we can allow for some exaggeration for comic effect.
In connection with my post on June 1817 fashions and caps, a reader said:
“I can't find a good pattern for a cap, or a turban. What would a Dowagwer wear on her head at a ball?”
Nancy Bradfield’s Costume in Detail 1730-1930 (described here) explains in minute detail the construction of some caps. Based on the cap I photographed at the 1809 Hedge House, I’d say the construction was fairly simple. It’s the trimming that makes caps individual. One of my favorite resources, The Lady’s Stratagem, a splendid compendium of excerpts from various manuals of the 1820s, has a section devoted to making caps, from three sources: the Manuel des dames, Manuel des demoiselles, and The Alphabetical Receipt Book and Domestic Advisor. The excerpt from the latter includes patterns.
The French manuals provide as well some guidance about appropriate attire for married and unmarried ladies. Though the French, as Fanny Trollope has pointed out, have stricter ideas about what “modest” and “simple” mean in reference to unmarried ladies’ dress, a general rule seems to apply on either side of the Channel: Married women may dress more boldly and elaborately than maidens.As to dowagers, what they wear would depend on their age and taste, I should think. We need to remember that fashion was not as standardized then as it is today. I would not expect her to wear simple hair ornaments to a ball. That seems more appropriate for a debutante. But she might wear a turban. Plumes are certainly possible. In portraits, older women are often wearing elaborate caps. However, in satirical prints, we see them in elaborate headdresses for evening dress. I suspect these are close to reality, though we can allow for some exaggeration for comic effect.
